Dear fellow pier 14 subscribers,
It's likely that in 2 to 3 weeks time our pier will be up and running using the new camera and filters. In the meantime as much of the outstanding jobs will continue to be collected, subject to the weather and the moon's position. We've recently received a lot of jobs back from our pier and these ought to be checked asap and any replacement data requested and added to the job queue.
What will happen to the existing list of our submissions I don't think has yet been mentioned. I'd like to see it cleared down just as soon as the existing setup is disabled. Assuming that this does happen then we will then be able to start to submit the new jobs based upon the revised fov.
I believe that now is a good time for us to start suggesting targets. We are effectively starting from scratch with a smaller fov but being able to use almost all of it without mis-shapen stars. For several individual targets a mosaic will now be necessary, so perhaps we can discuss what percentage overlap of the panels we should use.
The new joblist needs to keep the pier busy imaging from the start. Initially there may well be a short period during the night around the full moon when there will not be any narrowband jobs. I think we've all been made aware that future jobs will need to be continually added to the list, but maybe we should first concentrate on what is current and you would like to have.
One point that has been discussed on occasions but never given any backing is the number of hours submitted for a single job. With the change to how soon we have our data sent to us, that is the team no longer does a quick scan of the data beforehand, there will be many more instances of us having to submit a new job to replace bad subs.
For example, if you put in a job for 15 hours where there is a relatively short imaging window, then unless you get it back sooner, they'll not only be a shorter imaging window time remaining to collect the replacements, but there could be many more subs required.
With that recent change I personally think we should stick with a maximum recommended time for a single submission. It might be 8 to 10 hours as a range or 10 to 12 hours, plus a small tolerance.
This does not mean you can't go beyond that for your target, only that you'd need to split it into 2 or more jobs. If it involves broadband and narrowband filters then this might be a good way to split the job up. Personally I think that going beyond 20 to 24 hours needs to be discussed on the forum to let people know beforehand. Chances are you'll always get backing from other members of the Syndicate. It's not that you cannot submit whatever you like, it's simply being considerate to others.
I've rambled on for far too long as usual. Any thoughts, and all constructive criticism welcomed.
Cheers,
Ray
Ray
Roboscopes Guinea Pig
Thanks Phil,
Just sent a message to Manuel, not that I doubt you. :)
It may well be that at present I can send to everyone in the list of users I'm presented with. I have only sent to Manuel. This could be very involved and complicated, but is there a way for people to turn this off so that they don't receive messages from those they don't know. This could be a can of helminths.
Best regards,
Ray
Ray
Roboscopes Guinea Pig
Thanks Phil,
Just sent a message to Manuel, not that I doubt you. :)
It may well be that at present I can send to everyone in the list of users I'm presented with. I have only sent to Manuel. This could be very involved and complicated, but is there a way for people to turn this off so that they don't receive messages from those they don't know. This could be a can of helminths.
Best regards,
Ray
This is where I come in. If you get messaged from anyone you don't want, I will fix it. and fix them.
Phil McCauley
Roboscopes Website Admin
Phil,
On your private message, does £500 include one or both arms?
If a certain person goes on about future planning again, I might well take you up on the offer.
Cheers,
Ray
That just costs bacon and mushroom sandwich to be fair.
Phil McCauley
Roboscopes Website Admin
Good morning Manuel,
Looking forward to seeing what you have come up with and appreciate the effort you are putting in on this.
Just a suggestion. Maybe it would be a good idea when you share your plans to create a new post, titled something along the lines of 'Let's discuss mosaics'. At that time I may create one called 'Let's discuss targets' and re-post my original short list of single targets together with anything suggested in the meantime. I'm sure Mr Asbury :) has some good ideas.
I think re-posting my original post will help to tidy things up and make it quicker and easier to navigate. Together with your one on mosaics there ought to be plenty for us to discuss ahead of the completion of the pier.
Please do not take this seriously, although it does have one merit.
Perhaps a mega mosaic, once submitted we could take most of the year off and come back when it finishes. Suggestion appears below.
Good morning Ray,
Thanks a lot ... I am actually looking at a very similar mosaic setup ... Will share as soon as the plan is ready.
Cheers
Manuel
Manuel
Roboscopes General Technical
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.
You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
FLI
656 Imaging
10 Micron
Planewave
ZWO
Roboscopes
802 Kingsbury Road
Birmingham
B24 9PS
United Kingdom
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.