Wednesday, 29 July 2020
  2 Replies
  428 Visits
0
Votes
Undo
  Subscribe
On October 6, 1923 renowned astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered a pulsating star in the Andromeda Galaxy which quickly led to the revolutionary discovery that M31 is a galaxy unto itself 2.5 million light-years away, and not a gaseous cloud of stars within our own Milky Way.

That variable star is designated "M31 V0619" by the AAVSO. It pulsates between 18.5-19.8V every 31.404 days. It is a Cepheid type of variable star that has the distinct characteristic of revealing its distance by simply measuring its period and mean magnitude  Last year I accidentally captured it at maximum light in a mosaic of M31 with my lowly 71mm f/5.9 refractor. The problem is that one hour of integration time barely recorded it. There is no way that I can capture it at minimum light. I need to trade up my equipment. That is not feasible given the lousy weather here so RoboScopes to the rescue!

I've looked at pretty much every combination of scope and camera. The best one is Pier 8: CDK 17 with the KAF-16803 sensor.  According to my calculations in a single 30-minute exposure it can capture the star at minimum light (i.e. 19.8V) with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 85, and at maximum light (i.e. 18.5V) with SNR 250 without saturation. This is more than adequate to perform differential photometry.

(By the way it is OK that there is no Photometric "V" filter in the wheel. The luminance filter will be fine.)

So the problem becomes a matter of scheduling. I do have an ephemeris available to me that forecasts the moments of minimum and maximum light but what I'd really like to do is build a light curve of say 10 data points over a full cycle. Ideally this would require one frame to be acquired every 3 days. The problem is if I place a 5-hour order then RoboScope's scheduling algorithm will attempt to fill that order in one night if possible.

Does anyone have any ideas? I know that this pushes the limits of the business model.

Something I was thinking about is this: Put in a single order each week for as many weeks that are necessary to build a decent light curve.

Thanks,
Brian

EDIT: Actually Piers 3 and 10 are also well-suited and have a more attractive price point.
3 years ago
·
#1552
0
Votes
Undo
FYI one of the future plans with Pier 12 is to fir a FLI Kepler with 10 position wheel so we can then add 3 photmetric filters as well as the standard 7

I was keeping this under my hat until now as we like science as well as imaging also :)

Steve

Please ignore my dylexia wherever possible, just be thankful I can control my Tourettes ;)

Things to do, so little time!

Steve
Roboscopes Tea Boy


3 years ago
·
#1553
0
Votes
Undo
That's great news, Steve!

I would be happy to donate my once-used Baader Infrared filter seen here:
https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/filters/planetary/ubvri-i-filter-photometric-johnsonbessel-(4mm-glass).html

Unfortunately it is 1.25-inch round which is probably not large enough for your big sensors. I just can't hoover-up enough photons with my little refractor to get a good enough SNR. I purchased it as part of a large project of mapping the arms of the Milky Way. Since the arms have a lot of dust I need to use a modified form of Leavitt's Law. The new formula requires the I-mag in addition to the V-mag.

It's pretty standard to have a "B" and "V" filter. An "I" filter would be great to have.

Brian
  • Page :
  • 1
There are no replies made for this post yet.
Be one of the first to reply to this post!
Submit Your Response

Follow Us

Newsletter

Proud to use

  • FLI

  • 656 Imaging

  • 10 Micron

  • Planewave

  • ZWO

Company Details:

Roboscopes

802 Kingsbury Road
Birmingham
B24 9PS
United Kingdom


Roboscopes is a trading name of ENS Optical LTD ¦ Copyright© 2020 Roboscopes