Hi,
Duplicated job and jobs being done out of sequence. This ought to be a cause for concern as imaging time is precious.
The target which is drawing most attention is Wr134. This was originally submitted in March by Florent. In July this was submitted by Hoi but using slightly different coordinates.
Duplicates can be difficult to avoid and may occur due to the use of different catalogue names, or, when the original job was submitted months earlier, a roboscopes recommendation, and therefore easily missed by the person making the new submission.
The latter job has very recently been completed and has now drawn attention to focus issues. Inevitably this will result in more valuable imaging time being required to satisfactorily complete the job. A very necessary submission for retakes has been made. In the meantime many other narrowband targets submitted months ago lie dormant.
So what will receive the highest priority over the next month?
The retake job, the job submitted in March, jobs being submitted right now, or, those lying dormant?
As a minimum we need to discuss the Wr134 duplication issue and whether this immediately needs actioning.
This job sequence issue will not be solved by revised moon avoidance settings Steve, and I think this will be proved in the coming weeks.
If no one else shares any of these concerns, then that is okay with me.
Cheers,
Ray