Morning all
Capping imaging lengths is between you all to sort between yourselves if I am honest as its your pier to direct as a team
However if I may add my pennies worth to the mix, I do believe that using the sky better would also benefit the group. I know I have mentioned this before several times but feel its still worth mentioning once again for completeness
1, The system is based on moon avoidance algorithms and works best if you add objects across the whole 180º dome (minus horizon limits) as the moon over the course of a month rises in a different section/time
2, plan more in the future not just what's up now. put winter and spring jobs in now is a good thing as the system will know when to start imaging them as the rise and take advantage of them early in the season.
3, CMOS has higher sensitivity and lower noise than CCD so the amount if hours needed for a data set is less. in most cases 15-16-20-25 hour data sets are pointless except for all but the dimmest objects (special objects excluded from this statement)
All of the above will improve productivity by a massive amount
Roboscope's can only do so much, you are all aware of the moon avoidance parameters that we have set but you really need to take the moon into your planning much more in my opinion
If you don't utilise the system fully, you will not get the amount of data sets that the system is capable of producing
We will be entering our unsettled weather periods in the next 2 months so utilising the system to it's upmost is paramount in my opinion. It will also make our job easier to keep supplying you data sets through this period.
PS this applies to P1,2,3,5 and 14
I hope this helps but if you need any more pointers please let me know
Steve